It has been more than 20 years since we lived in Egypt, and then only for 14 months, but it strikes me that the current life in Egypt hasn't changed much -- except perhaps a new will to act.
In fact that's exactly what a CBC report suggests
In Egypt, discontent with life in the autocratic, police state has simmered under the surface for years. But there has also been growing discontent over economic woes, poverty, unemployment, corruption and police abuses.
The question is, what will emerge? If Mubarak is toppled [I still think that would be quite a leap], what forces will move into the empty space? He has effectively kept any kind of alternative democratic process/movement almost non-existent -- that is, there is no alternative organizational infrastructure.
I am afraid I support the interpretation expressed in this post: Uh Oh, White House Declines to Endorse Mubarak -- that the vacuum created by the popular uprising against the Shah of Iran [who had likewise squelched all democratic organizational infrastructure] was filled by the organizational infrastructure of the Ayatollah Khomeini. Repeat the scenario when strong-man Saddam Hussein was taken out -- no democratic infrastructure, filled by Shiite infrastructure. The Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt is the long-established organizational infrastructure that is likely to prevail in a Mubarak-less world.
What continually peeves me on these scenarios is that anyone with any knowledge, at all, about this part of the world, could tell you this. But the US continues to support their anti-democratic strong-men and express shock when it all falls apart. ... oh yeah, but then they get to invade... so maybe they do know what they are doing... then they put in place their Westernized puppets from the social elite like Karzai, Allawi et al, [the touted person for Egypt is El-Baradei] and so it starts all over again.



dissatisfaction persists
thots from The Abundant Community...
Consumer society begins at the moment when what was once the province or function of the family and community migrates to the marketplace. It begins with the decision to purchase what might have been homemade or neighbourhood produced. This is how citizens begin to yield their power to the lure of consumption.
the authors give a summary from Jeffrey Kaplan's essay The Gospel of Consumption on the roots of our consumer society. Herbert Hoover's 1929 Committee on Recent Economic Changes observed: "by advertising and other promotional devices...a measurable pull on production has been created which releases capital otherwise tied up." The tied up capital was savings.
In other words, as Stephen Harper told us -- "spend, spend, spend" including your savings. Now the Canadian economists are suggesting that we may have spent too much of our savings, go figure...
the 1929 US govt doc also celebrated: "economically we have boundless field before us; that there are new wants which make way endlessly for newer wants, as fast as they are satisfied." in other words there is no end to satisfaction, or it is a way of promoting dissatisfaction as the basis for higher levels of consumption and production.
The marketplace in this way promises what it knows will not be fulfilling. This defines its counterfeit nature -- trying to make something appear to be gratifying or satisfying when it is not. The fact that dissatisfaction persists after the successful pursuit of the 'good life' means the good life is not satisfying. Un-functional families and incompetent communities are the signal that we have reached the limits of satisfaction.
Colleagues ministering among the working or destitute poor often speak of 'a bias toward the poor' in the gospel. I believe we need to craft a gospel/good news response for those who have found 'the good life' unsatisfying. People among whom there is poverty of spirit, but not poverty of goods or resources. It's easy to identify those who are poor in resources (I have just returned from a trip to Niger; almost lowest HDI rating in the world), but often the poor in spirit are able to mask their dissatisfaction with goods (on the other hand I identified great joy in spirit among 'poor' Nigerien friends).
January 25, 2011 in Books, Missional Church, Social justice commentary | Permalink | Comments (0)